Archive for April 2008

India Rejects Microsoft’s OOXML Format

India Rejects Microsoft’s OOXML Format: Reloaded!
Swapnil Bhartiya, EFY News Network
(Thursday, March 20, 2008 3:33:23 PM)


The BIS Committee has rejected the OOXML format.

Thursday, March 20, 2008: The BIS LITD 15 Committee has rejected Microsoft’s document format OOXML. According to sources, out of 19 members, five of them did not attend the meeting, one of them abstained, five voted in favour of OOXML and the rest voted against. The meeting took place today in Delhi at the BIS office.
Microsoft has released a statement which says, “While we are disappointed with the decision of the BIS LITD 15 committee, we are very encouraged by the support of IT industry players like NASSCOM, TCS, Wipro and Infosys who voted in favour of Open XML becoming an ISO standard. Further, the Indian government, industry stalwarts and trade bodies have supported multiple standards and technology neutrality. We will therefore continue to work with the government to address any concerns they may have and to achieve its stated goal of technology neutrality. We are committed to working towards what is best for the Indian IT industry.”

The statement is contradictory in itself where Microsoft is talking about neutrality. The European Union (EU) has worked really hard to neutralise most of Microsoft’s antics. Microsoft’s openness seems less out of desire and more out of growing power of FOSS movement and legal pressure by the EU. Neelie Kroes, Competition Commissioner, EU said last month, “Today, the European Commission has imposed a substantial fine, to be precise €899 million ($1.35 billion), on Microsoft for its non-compliance up until 27 October 2007 with its obligations under the Commission’s March 2004 decision to provide interoperability information on reasonable terms.”

Total penalties against Microsoft now stand tall at around $2.5 billion.

In the statement, Microsoft further said, “The concerns raised by the LITD 15 Committee have been addressed by the ISO and Ecma International (the proposer of the ISO/IEC DIS 29500 Office Open XML) with a majority of the comments getting addressed at the recently concluded Ballot Resolution Meeting (BRM) at Geneva. We hoped that 98.73 per cent of the total 1027 comments from all National Bodies stood resolved at the BRM would be welcomed by the BIS, as it has been by the National Bodies of numerous countries.”

This is what the ISO website says about the BRM, “No decision or vote on the document as a whole or any part of it was taken at the meeting, but only on proposed changes to it.

It further says, “Following the BRM, all 87 national member bodies who voted in the original fast-track ballot have 30 days – until midnight CET on 29 March 2008 – to examine the actions taken in response to the comments and to reconsider their vote if they wish. If the modifications proposed are such that national bodies then wish to withdraw their negative votes, or turn abstentions into positive votes, and the acceptance criteria are then met, the standard may proceed to publication. Otherwise, the proposal will have failed and this fast-track procedure will be terminated. This would not preclude subsequent re-submission under the normal IEC and ISO standards development rules.”

India’s dismissal of OOXML could be seen as first major blow to Microsoft’s ambitions of making OOXML as an ISO standard. It might encourage other countries to follow the suite.

And everyone hopes this time we would not come across the infamous case reported in Sweden where some alleged Microsoft employees bribed to vote in OOXML’s favour.

http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/fullnewsp.asp?edid=25529

Happy new year

Wish you all, a very happy new year!

Happy new year

An Open Letter to Wipro, Infosys and TCS

http://www.fossmeet.in/node/128

6th April 2008

This letter is to express our deep disappointment over your open
support to the OOXML format forced through ISO by Microsoft. Being the
top IT giants and thus the representatives of the IT industry in the
country, it is a great shock to us that you do not stand with academia
of the country and its representatives like the IITs, IIMs and IISc in
supporting the Open Document Format (ODF) which is a true Free and
Open Standard already recognised as an ISO Standard. Considering that
a major portion of your employees come from such institutions, it is a
wonder to us that you have decided to go ahead with this decisions. We
would like to hear your explanation with respect to these points
:-( quoted from www.noooxml.org/petition)

1. There is already a standard ISO26300 named Open Document Format
(ODF): a dual standard adds costs, uncertainty and confusion to
industry, government and citizens;

2. There is no provable implementation of the OOXML specification:
Microsoft Office 2007 produces a special version of OOXML, not a file
format which complies with the OOXML specification;

3. There is information missing from the specification document, for
example how to do a ´autoSpaceLikeWord95´ or
´useWord97LineBreakRules´;

4. More than 10% of the examples mentioned in the proposed standard do
not validate as XML;

5. There is no guarantee that anybody can write software that fully or
partially implements the OOXML specification without being liable to
patent lawsuits or patent license fees by Microsoft;

6. This format conflicts with existing ISO standards, such as ISO 8601
(Representation of dates and times), ISO 639 (Codes for the
Representation of Names and Languages) or ISO/IEC 10118-3
(cryptographic hash);

7. There is a bug in the spreadsheet file format which forbids any
date before the year 1900: such bugs affect the OOXML specification as
well as software applications like Microsoft Excel 2000, XP, 2003 and
2007.

8. This standard proposal was not created by bringing together the
experience and expertise of all interested parties (such as the
producers, sellers, buyers, users and regulators), but by Microsoft
alone.

With this decision, the impression you are making on your future
employees in the academia is not a very pretty one. In fact, the
development of OOXML receiving ISO´s approval has devalued our
confidence in the standards setting process itself. We hope that you
will put self-profit behind our country´s needs, change your decision,
and stand with the rest of the country on this issue.

PS:
Please forward this to the groups you are in…


പ്രവീണ്‍ അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്‍
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Join The DRM Elimination Crew Now!
http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign